Council for the National Interest

Divided no longer, Hollywood poised to put big money behind Hillary Clinton

Apr 22 2015 / 8:46 pm

“…. Hollywood is considered one of the most important sources of money for Democratic presidential candidates ….. united by a sense of common purpose ….. Clinton’s strong record of support for Israel — a topic of great concern to Tinseltown players such as Saban — should help the former secretary of state…”

Richard Verrier and Daniel Miller, LA Times – What a difference eight years makes.

In the campaign for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, Hollywood’s loyalties were divided between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

This time, Clinton is expected to face little primary competition — and the left-leaning entertainment industry is poised to become a major source of campaign cash.

Clinton has already lined up support from some of the industry’s most prominent leaders, including Jeffrey Katzenberg, Steven Spielberg and “Girls” creator Lena Dunham.

“I’ve got an inbox full of people offering to hold events for Hillary,” said Andy Spahn, whose political consulting firm Gonring, Spahn & Associates advises Katzenberg and Spielberg. “There is great respect and admiration and excitement around Hillary and also a very clear understanding of what the stakes are.”

Hollywood is considered one of the most important sources of money for Democratic presidential candidates — a single fundraiser for President Obama at the home of actor George Clooney in 2012 famously raised $15 million for Obama’s reelection campaign, among the biggest single-night hauls in political fundraising history.

Some prominent Democratic backers are still on the fence. But political consultants said they expect that Hollywood power players — most of whom are squarely on the left — will come out in full support for a Clinton presidency.

“The passion for ensuring the election for a Democrat will be extremely high — it will almost be an obsession,” Los Angeles-based Democratic political strategist Donna Bojarsky said. “Republicans have both houses of Congress, and we are being treated to the prospect of the tea party and right-wing Republicans advocating things that are distinctly unpopular around here.”

In the 2008 Democratic primary race, several high-profile Hollywood figures, including mogul David Geffen and Katzenberg, supported Obama. It led to bruised egos in the Clinton camp given the candidate’s long-standing ties to the industry.

In widely publicized comments, Geffen, once one of Bill Clinton’s biggest supporters, called then-New York Sen. Hillary Clinton an “incredibly polarizing figure.” He criticized her husband’s 2001 pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich and suggested that the former president’s personal habits would damage his wife’s campaign.

“Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling,” Geffen said of the Clintons in an interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd in 2007.

The comments caused such a stir that Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, Terry McAuliffe, warned that Clinton would remember those who did not back her. “You’re either with us or against us,” McAuliffe told potential donors during a dinner at the home of media mogul Haim Saban. [Saban has said: “I’m a one-issue guy, and my issue is Israel.”]

A spokeswoman for Geffen said he would vote for Clinton but declined to comment further.

Democratic political consultant Chris Lehane, who served as an attorney in the Clinton White House, believes that Hollywood donors are now united by a sense of common purpose.

“In 2008, there were two green-light actors vying for the lead role,” Lehane said. “In 2016, there is one green-light actor vying for the lead role, which makes it very easy for those in show business to know where they are going on this.”

Clinton’s strong record of support for Israel — a topic of great concern to Tinseltown players such as Saban — should help the former secretary of state, he added.

Also, the chance to elect a female president could prove a rallying point for women in the entertainment industry.

“It’s a moment for women in Hollywood — just like women everywhere else — to show their daughters that this is possible,” Bojarsky said.

Some prominent Democrats, however, aren’t yet ready to jump on board the Ready for Hillary campaign. They would prefer a more contested Democratic primary rather than handing the nomination to Clinton.

“I hope Elizabeth Warren comes in and does a primary, because I think that would be good,” actor Mark Ruffalo said at the Hollywood premiere of “Avengers: Age of Ultron.” “If Hillary is nominated, I will be pulling for her.”

In addition, left-leaning liberals view Clinton as too moderate on important issues, such as climate change and defense.

Still other Democrats are loyal to Obama and would like to see him accomplish some of his remaining goals, rather than publicly rallying around Clinton.

Clinton has already lined up support from some of the industry’s most prominent leaders, including Jeffrey Katzenberg, Steven Spielberg and “Girls” creator Lena Dunham, pictured.

Some high-profile Hollywood Democrats — such as Netflix Chief Content Officer Ted Sarandos and his wife, Nicole Avant, a former U.S. ambassador to the Bahamas — have yet to publicly declare their support for Clinton.

“Key players are demonstrating a range of views about her running, from caution to optimism, and at this point offering armchair analysis of her playbook and campaign strategy,” said Paul Pflug, whose firm Principal Communications Group/Sky Advisory advises clients on political and philanthropic goals. “But through it all, the majority of this company town will ultimately rally around Clinton.”

Planning has already begun for multiple fundraisers for Clinton in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York. They could begin as early as next month.

Katzenberg is a big supporter of Clinton and “will play a major role on her behalf,” said Spahn, the political consultant. He said it was too early to discuss details of upcoming fundraising events.

Democrats have long relied on the generous backing of entertainment industry heavyweights, a fact that Republican critics have used to show their opponents as being out of touch with regular Americans.

In early 2007, Geffen, Spielberg and Katzenberg kicked off the race for campaign dollars with a reception for Obama’s presidential exploratory committee at the Beverly Hilton Hotel. One high-profile Obama event took place at the Santa Barbara home of Oprah Winfrey.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Jeffrey and Marilyn Katzenberg’s political contributions totaled $3.5 million in the 2011-12 cycle. Donations from Spielberg and his wife, Kate Capshaw, totaled $1.3 million, most of which went to the political action committee supporting Obama’s reelection, Priorities USA Action. Comedian Bill Maher donated $1 million to the organization.

For the entire 2008 election cycle, the entertainment industry raised about $51 million, with 79% of the total going to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The industry raised nearly $66 million for the 2012 cycle, with 73% for Democrats.

Even in nonpresidential election years, Obama has not shied away from political campaign events in Southern California. In October, the president attended a fundraiser at actress Gwyneth Paltrow’s home in Brentwood, where about 200 supporters gathered during the contentious 2014 midterm elections.

Clinton supporters have been out raising money for more than a year. They’ve asked potential donors to give to the Clinton Foundation or the Ready for Hillary PAC.

Beyond raising cash, Clinton is already gaining some celebrity traction on social media, which is where she announced her candidacy. Many took to Twitter to show support.

“This is Hillary reading a text from me that says ‘with you every step of the way, gurl’ #mypresident,” Dunham tweeted with a link to an Instagram photo of Clinton looking down at her cellphone while wearing sunglasses.



The Forward: Hillary Clinton Set for Boost From Hollywood’s Jewish Big Names

Ted Johnson, Reuters, Forward — As Hillary Clinton launches her second run for the White House, Hollywood Democrats appear ready to deliver a far more unified front than greeted her last campaign.

Some of the biggest industry fundraisers, like Jeffrey Katzenberg, who famously backed Obama over Clinton in the 2008 race, long ago pledged their support. With a lack of serious competitors, progressives who are lukewarm to her candidacy face a race with few alternatives. And for almost two years, a number of industry figures have been raising money in a kind of pre-campaign, as if to ensure that some of the bitter divisions of the last time around don’t materialize again.

Fundraising sources say that Clinton’s first swing through Los Angeles to raise money is in the planning for early May, with one of the events hosted by media mogul Haim Saban, longtime friend of the Clintons, at his home. A spokeswoman for Saban did not return multiple requests for comment.

An announcement of her candidacy could come as early as this weekend, with multiple media sources reporting that it will be made on Sunday followed by trips to New Hampshire and Iowa.

Clinton entered her last campaign – “I’m in, and I’m in to win” – as the presumptive front-runner, but in the entertainment industry that quickly was countered by Barack Obama’s entrance in the race. Katzenberg, David Geffen and Steven Spielberg hosted the cycle’s first major industry event for Obama in February, 2007, and a the next day, a Maureen Dowd interview with Geffen in which he bashed both Clintons triggered the first signs of acrimony between the two campaigns.

As the Clinton-Obama primary race dragged on in 2008, Hollywood was split, to the point of acrimony carried out in email chains and at cocktail parties. A meeting with then-Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean turned in to a drawn-out argument over party delegate rules. Larry David took to the Huffington Post to write (and read) an essay in which he called her “unhinged.” Harvey Weinstein reportedly threatened to cut off money to House Democrats if Speaker Nancy Pelosi didn’t agree to a primary revote that presumably would have allowed Clinton to secure added delegates in Florida and Michigan.

So far it’s hard to see those fault lines materializing.

“There is both great respect for Hillary and great enthusiasm for her expected candidacy,” says Andy Spahn, whose firm Gonring Spahn & Associates represents figures like Katzenberg and Spielberg. “The stakes are so high…possible Supreme Court appointments and the threat the Republican agenda poses to all that President Obama has accomplished.”

This time around, the Clinton naysayers on the left are so far without the formidable presence of an alternative of Obama’s stature, even if they have concerns about her candidacy. Adam McKay, co-creator of Funny or Die, said in an interview with Variety’s “PopPolitics” last September that he thinks “her excitement factor is going to rise and fall based on how horrible the Republican candidate is.” He expressed concerns that she was too pro-big corporate and hawkish, calling his sentiment “lukewarm” and pointing to alternatives like Elizabeth Warren.

In fact, a group called Artists for Warren, an offshoot of MoveOn, held an event in February, with celebrities like Mark Ruffalo offering support. Norman Lear has said that he would like to see Warren run for president – and recently hosted her for an event at his home – just not necessarily this year. He also is good friends with the Clintons. “Too bad one isn’t a Republican. We would get to see the two running against each other,” he quipped to Variety’s “PopPolitics” last year.

The obvious problem with a Warren candidacy is that she has repeatedly said she is not running.

“The whole coziness [by Clinton] with the business community is a concern for a lot of liberal Democrats,” says one top industry executive, who declined to be identified. “There’s a lot of fans, too. But part of this is going to rest on her shoulders. Can she rally the troops and say, ‘This is not going to just be the same old Clinton machine?’”

But Geffen, despite the harsh words about the Clintons in 2007, has said that he would “absolutely” support Clinton this time around. The Clintons ties in the entertainment community extend back to Bill Clinton’s days as governor of Arkansas, probably closer still than even those of Obama after seven years in office. Saban became one of the top donors in the Democratic party during Clinton’s presidency, and already has said that he would contribute “as much as needed” to the Clinton campaign.

Ben Austin, a former aide in Bill Clinton’s White House who also worked with actor-director Rob Reiner on California school reform, said that Clinton’s assets will be obvious. “I do think her real self is quite likable and electable,” said Austin, who now works at a non profit for school reform. “But that means being authentic and that can be tough when you have been through all the things you have been through.”

There also has been a movement to lay the groundwork for a Clinton campaign well before it began. Producer Howard Gordon hosted an even last fall for the SuperPAC Ready for Hillary, with Burt Bacharach singing “Raindrops Keep Fallin On My Head” and playing other standards on a clear Southern California day. Ryan Murphy also was among the hosts, and such figures as Dana Walden and Gail Berman attended.

Since she resigned as Secretary of State, Clinton herself has made multiple visits to appear at Hollywood-centric events, most recently a fundraiser in October in Brentwood that was hosted by Katzenberg and raised $2.1 million for Senate candidates.

Katzenberg not only is expected to raise money for her campaign but for a SuperPAC, PrioritiesUSA, that is aligning with her candidacy.

In fact, a challenge for the campaign may be managing the relationships the Clintons have built up over the years, with some fundraisers who worked for Obama wondering if there are just too many people angling for visibility to make it all worth their while.

An industry figure long active in politics says that “one of the significant challenges her candidacy faces is managing the internecine and internal competitions to be seen as closest to the seat of power. You are talking relationships, and feeding at the Clinton trough, that has gone on for 30 years. The challenge for the Clinton team now is to know when and how to say ‘No.’”

Political and philathropic consultant Lara Bergthold says, “There will be a lot of jockeying for that. But there’s no lack of need to raise money. Everyone can have their time in the spotlight.” An advantage for Clinton is that she doesn’t need to have a celebrity fronting her campaign rally to draw a crowd, and she can also draw on that support to host their own events.

Bergthold said that among some industry progressives, “I would say there is watchfulness. People are watchful to see what she rolls out and when.” She said that there has been encouragement from what Clinton has taken progressive positions on such issues as the minimum wage and education. Yet from now until the general election, she said, it will be a “tough race.” “We all need to buckle up,” she said. “It is not going to any way be a coronation.”

When it comes to enthusiasm, there is also the obvious: Clinton would be the first woman president, something that donors say will help draw excitement as well as a certain kind of disbelief that it hasn’t happened yet.

And perhaps nothing will unite industry Democrats than the prospect of a Republican in the White House. After all, that is another difference from 2008, when Democrats went into the election in control of Congress.

“I don’t see any sideline sitting in Hollywood on this one,” said one prominent Southern California fundraiser. A bellwether for the industry’s enthusiasm for electing candidates could come in the coming days, when California Attorney General Kamala Harris, running for an open Senate seat after Barbara Boxer’s retirement, reports her first fund-raising totals.

“There is a lot of entertainment money coming in there,” the fundraiser said. “You will see they are in a giving mood, in a pretty serious way.”


Leaked emails reveal Hollywood execs at work for Israel

Rule 1: Talk About Anything Political in Hollywood … Except Gaza

Posted by on Apr 22 2015 . Filed under Candidates, Commentary & Analysis, Featured articles, Israel Lobby, Israeli/Jewish Press, Politicians, Popular Media / News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 . Both comments and pings are currently closed.

National Summit Videos

Watch videos from the Nation Summit!

Click image to watch videos from the National Summit to reassess the U.S.-Israel "Special Relationship".

Support CNI

The posting of articles from organizations or individuals does not necessarily denote agreement with or endorsement of political positions or philosophies espoused by these highly diverse sources. For CNI's position please see our mission statement.
Disclaimer RSS Feed Contact Us
© Copyright 2024 Council for the National Interest.
Powered By Chromovision